New Method for Identifying Defects

I’ve been reading about a new ultrasonic testing technique that’s being integrated into textile quality assurance protocols. This method claims to improve defect detection significantly compared to traditional visual inspections. Has anyone else tried incorporating this technology in their processes? I’m interested in hearing about the practical applications and any challenges you faced.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠‌​‌‍‌‌‌⁠‍​‌⁠‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠‌‌⁠⁠‌⁠‌​‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​⁠​​​⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‍⁠‌⁠​‌‌‌​⁠‌‍​‍‌‌‍‌‌‍‍​‌‍​‌‌⁠​‌‌⁠‌‌‌⁠​‌​⁠​​‌‍​‌​⁠​‌‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​

And ultrasonic testing can make a huge difference, especially with complex fabrics. We integrated it last year and found defects we never caught before, but it does take some time to train staff. Have you looked into the cost vs. the potential savings on reworks?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠‌​‌‍‌‌‌⁠‍​‌⁠‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​⁠​⁠‌⁠​⁠‌⁠​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​⁠​​​⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠‌‍‌​​‍‌‌‍​‌‍⁠​‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‍‌​​‍‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠‌​‌‌‌⁠‌‌‌​‌⁠​​‌‌​‍‌‍⁠​‌‍‌⁠‌‍‍‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

It sounds like ultrasonic testing is a game changer! We’ve had success using it on some of our technical fabrics, but I find it can be tricky with thicker materials. @felix_32, have you noticed differences in how various fabric weights respond to the tests?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠‌​‌‍‌‌‌⁠‍​‌⁠‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​⁠​⁠‌⁠​⁠‌⁠​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​⁠​​​⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌⁠⁠‌‌‍‍‌​⁠​​⁠‌​‌‌‌​‌⁠​‌‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‍‌​⁠⁠‌‍‍‍‌⁠‌‍‌​⁠​‌​‌⁠‌⁠‍‌‌‌‍‌‌‍‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

I’ve definitely seen the benefits of ultrasonic testing in our quality checks, but , the learning curve can be a hassle. If you’re not careful with the settings, it can lead to false positives, which drives me nuts! Have you thought about collaborating with a tech specialist for a smoother integration? It might save you some headaches.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠‌​‌‍‌‌‌⁠‍​‌⁠‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​⁠​⁠‌⁠​⁠‌⁠​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​⁠​‌​⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠‌‍‌​‌‌‌​‌‍‌⁠‌‌‌​‍‌‌‍⁠‍‌​​‍​⁠‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​⁠‌​‌​‌‌‍​‌⁠‌‍​⁠‌‌‌‌​⁠‌​​‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

I can see ultrasonic testing being a powerful tool, but have you considered how it affects workflow? Sometimes it feels like learning to drive stick — great once you get it, but can be a bumpy ride initially… @felix_32, what settings have you found most tricky to manage?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠‌​‌‍‌‌‌⁠‍​‌⁠‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​⁠​⁠‌⁠​⁠‌⁠​⁠‌‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​⁠​‌​⁠‍​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌​‌⁠‌‍​‍‌‌​‌​⁠​‌​⁠‍​‌⁠‍‍‌‍‍⁠​‍⁠‌‌‌​⁠‌‍⁠⁠‌​‌‌‌⁠​‌‌‌​‌‌⁠​​‌​⁠⁠‌‍‍​​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌